Conducting a Literature Review - 2 ECTS
CBS PhD School
Course Coordinator: Professor Tanusree Jain, Department of Management, Society and Communication, CBS
Aim
In this course, we will learn to understand, evaluate, and juxtapose the different kinds of literature reviews on offer within the broader stream of Management and Organization, and learn to apply various approaches to conducting a systematic review. The objective is for you, a post graduate student, to understand the criticality of a good quality literature review, what it entails, and identify and formulate a plan to incorporate a literature review within your own doctoral research work. This module will not build your knowledge on your subject area, rather it will equip you with the knowledge and tools to conduct a systematic literature review, which you can apply to your own area of interest. This course will not cover the use of AI in conducting a literature review.
Learning objectives
Having completed this course, the student should be able to:
1. Learn to critically analyse existing review papers in terms of research design, method adopted, paper structure and flow.
2. Understand and evaluate the different kinds of literature reviews on offer.
3. Juxtapose various approaches employed in conducting literature reviews and assess their suitability to specific kinds of research questions.
4. Identify and formulate a plan to incorporate a literature review within your own doctoral research work.
5. Learn about reviewing and publishing a literature review paper in different management journals.
Workload
Pre-workshop preparation: 34 hours
Class sessions: 16 hours
Project preparation and presentation: 12 hours
Total 62 hours
Course content
This module draws on resources from multiple sources. This is arranged by lecture topic.
Required core course readings with be shared on canvas. Along with these readings, we will be basing our discussions on specific literature reviews provided as exemplars that have been published across a variety of high-quality AJG journals. Many of these exemplar reviews were authored by the professor of this course and students will get an insider perspective to crafting as well as publishing different kinds of reviews across different management journals. Students are expected to read all these literature reviews in advance of classes as strategies informing these reviews will be actively discussed and built on in this seminar.
The course is designed as a 2.5 day face-to-face in person seminar at Copenhagen Business School (Denmark). The course will follow a research seminar format that includes lecture presentations, guided discussions, group and individual work from 9 am to 4 pm with breaks. Day 3 will conclude with student presentations of their own literature review ideas that they will further develop during this course by applying seminar learnings and a seminar on reviewing and publishing a literature review paper in management journals. These presentations will be developmental in nature to get feedback and demonstrate understanding of the course. In addition to a critical and appreciative review of existing work, the seminar emphasizes constructive discussions aimed at helping students to design and progress their own literature reviews.
Teaching methods
Lectures, exercises, student presentations and discussions.
Lecture plan
All sessions will be taught by Professor Tanusree Jain
Day 1:
13.30 - 14.00: Welcome coffee and introduction to the course
14.00 - 16.00: Part 1: Introduction to a literature review
Day 2:
9:00 - 10.30: Part 2 A: Mechanics of a Literature Review
10.30 - 10.45: Coffee Break
10.45-12.15: Discussion
12.15- 12.45: Lunch Break
12.45-13.30: Part 2 B: Mechanics of a Literature Review
13.30 – 14.30 Group and individual work
14.30 – 14.45 Coffee Break
14.15- 15.45: Crafting your literature review ideas and guided discussion
15.45- 16.00 Wrap up
Day 3:
9.00 - 10.30: Part 3: Beyond Mechanics: Theorizing in a Literature Review 10.30 - 10.45: Coffee break
10.45 - 12.15: Part 4: Writing your own literature review within a doctoral thesis
12.15 - 12.45: Lunch Break
12.45 – 14.00 Student Presentations and Feedback
14.00 – 14.15 Coffee break
14.15 – 15.45 Reviewing and Publishing workshop
15.45 – 16.00 Conclusion to the Course.
Essential Readings
Kunisch, S., Menz, M., Bartunek, J. M., Cardinal, L. B., & Denyer, D. (2018). Feature topic at organizational research methods: how to conduct rigorous and impactful literature reviews?. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 519-523.
Short, J. (2009). The art of writing a review article. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1312-1317.
Hiebl, M. R. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational research methods, 26(2), 229-261.
Simsek, Z., Fox, B., & Heavey, C. (2023). Systematicity in organizational research literature reviews: A framework and assessment. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 292-321.
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2023). Best-practice recommendations for producers, evaluators, and users of methodological literature reviews. Organizational research methods, 26(1), 46-76.
Laasonen, S., Fougère, M., & Kourula, A. (2012). Dominant articulations in academic business and society discourse on NGO–business relations: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 521-545.
Shepherd, D. A., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 361-380.
Breslin, D., & Gatrell, C. (2023). Theorizing through literature reviews: The miner-prospector continuum. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 139-167
Fan, D., Breslin, D., Callahan, J. L., & Iszatt‐White, M. (2022). Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews : IJMR, 24(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. (2023). Partnering up: Including managers as research partners in systematic reviews. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 262-291.
Exemplar Literature Reviews for all Sessions
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of management review, 32(3), 836-863.
Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate governance: an international review, 24(3), 253-273.
Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Jamali, D. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), 690-752.
Jamali, D., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Zoghbi, E. (2020). How institutions affect CSR practices in the Middle East and North Africa: A critical review. Journal of World Business, 55(5), 101127.
Kirsch, A. (2018). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 346-364.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968.
Donaldson, T. (2012). The epistemic fault line in corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 256-271.
Nardella, G., Brammer, S., & Surdu, I. (2023). The social regulation of corporate social irresponsibility: Reviewing the contribution of corporate reputation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1),
200-229.
Xie, J., & Jain, T. (2024). Unpacking micro-CSR through a computational literature review: an identity heterogeneity view of internal stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 172, 114451.